| for rejecting a Ḥadīth, do not include any principle that allows one to reject a narration based on its inconformity to Qur’ānic meaning. Nevertheless, it could be considered as an indication but not a primary principle. Therefore, any such Ḥadīth that is not found in the primary books of Aḥādīth and is also against the meaning of any Qur’ānic Verse can be renounced. It is notable however that it will be renounced primarily on the basis of its chain of narration and not merely because of its inconformity, because any such Ḥadīth is unlikely to have any valid chain of narration. As opposed to the classical view, the modernistic approach towards these principles based on cognitive consideration entails discarding narrations that are not only approved by the strong chain of narration and principles of validity, but also those that are found in the two major books of Hādīth i.e. Sahīhayn. It is also notable that according to this approach, the reason for renunciation implies declaration of any such narration to be inconformity to Qur’ān merely on the basis of an individual’s understanding and interpretation as opposed to the classical or mainstream understanding of scholarly experts of the field. Similarly, in practice, according to the modern view, the meaning of any narration that is considered logically unreasonable refers to that specific narration which fails to appeal an individual’s reason and logic rather than mainstream academics’ reasoning and comprehension. عصر حاضر میں حدیث نبوی کی درایتی تحقیق کا مطالبہ بڑی شدومد کے ساتھ جاری ہے اور بعض معاصر اسکالر حضرات حدیث نبوی کو خلاف قرآن یا خلاف عقل قرار دے کر اس کو رد کرنے کی سعی کرتے ہیں۔ آج کل اس مخصوص فکروذہن کے ساتھ حدیث نبوی کا انکار کرنا ایک عام مشغلہ بن کر رہ گیا ہے کہ جسے سند جواز فراہم کرنے |